Kellogg Company v. Pack'em Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Affirming Board’s holding that the dissimilarity of the marks—FROOTEE ICE and FROOT LOOPS—was dispositive
• “We know of no reason why, in a particular case, a single DuPont factor may not be dispositive.”
• “We know of no reason why, in a particular case, a single duPont factor may not be dispositive”
• “We know of no reason why, in a particular case, a single duPont factor may not be dispositive”
• “We know of no reason why, in a particular case, a single du Pont factor may not be dispositive”
• we know of no reason why, in a particular case, a single duPont factor may not be dispositive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).