Kelley v. Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring plaintiff to show that “defendant induced a breach of contractual obligations or caused a party or third parties to discontinue or fail to enter into an anticipated business relationship with the plaintiff”
• tortious interference claim failed because plaintiff could not show that, independent of alleged misdeeds, the result would have been different
• “And, any damage claimed to have been suffered by a plaintiff does not proximately result from the defendants’ alleged misconduct, if the damage would have occurred notwithstanding their misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).