Kelley v. Sprinkle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s refusal to qualify a witness as an expert was harmless error as two other witnesses had given the same testimony that the rejected expert would have given
• in response to questioning of a witness court stated that \any five year old idiot knows that.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).