Skip to main content
· 8/8/1996

Kelley v. South Bay Bank (In Re Kelley)

Citations

  • 199 B.R. 698
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8745
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 12627
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1049
  • 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 769
  • 1996 WL 494920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “if the debtor fails to mention the cause of action in either his schedules, disclosure statement, or plan, then he will be precluded from asserting it postconfirmation”
  • holding that “if the debtor fails to mention the cause of action in either his schedules, disclosure statement, or plan, then he will be precluded from asserting it postconfirmation”
  • finding a blanket reservation insufficient to prevent the application of res judicata to a specific action
  • “If a confirmed plan expressly reserves the right to litigate a specific cause of action after confirmation, then res judicata does not apply.”
  • “Creditors vote on the plan on the basis of how the plan treats their claims.”
  • “If a confirmed plan expressly reserves the right to litigate a specific cause of action after confirmation, then res judicata does not apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Hagan, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.