· 8/8/1996
Kelley v. South Bay Bank (In Re Kelley)
Citations
- 199 B.R. 698
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8745
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 12627
- 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1049
- 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 769
- 1996 WL 494920
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “if the debtor fails to mention the cause of action in either his schedules, disclosure statement, or plan, then he will be precluded from asserting it postconfirmation”
- holding that “if the debtor fails to mention the cause of action in either his schedules, disclosure statement, or plan, then he will be precluded from asserting it postconfirmation”
- finding a blanket reservation insufficient to prevent the application of res judicata to a specific action
- “If a confirmed plan expressly reserves the right to litigate a specific cause of action after confirmation, then res judicata does not apply.”
- “Creditors vote on the plan on the basis of how the plan treats their claims.”
- “If a confirmed plan expressly reserves the right to litigate a specific cause of action after confirmation, then res judicata does not apply”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Hagan, Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.