Skip to main content
· 8/9/2011

Kelley v. Patel

Citations

  • 953 N.E.2d 505
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1487
  • 2011 WL 3475275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the lack of “exclusive possession” was “not per se dispositive, as Wilmoth declined to limit the duty to preserve evidence to instances when an insurer physically takes possession of certain evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Bailey, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.