· 8/9/2011
Kelley v. Patel
Citations
- 953 N.E.2d 505
- 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1487
- 2011 WL 3475275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the lack of “exclusive possession” was “not per se dispositive, as Wilmoth declined to limit the duty to preserve evidence to instances when an insurer physically takes possession of certain evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb, Bailey, Crone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.