Kelley v. Kelley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial court had concluded that the wife’s expenses were inflated, but it had not indicated “what amounts were appropriate based upon the evidence presented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCants v. McCants
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-09· cited 23×
• Zinovoy v. Zinovoy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-29· cited 20×
• Wright v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-17· cited 7×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pimm v. Pimm
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 121×
• Acker v. Acker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-14· cited 26×
• Cleary v. Cleary
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 16×
• Griffin v. Griffin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 9×
• Anciaux v. Anciaux
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-19· cited 7×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 4×