Kelley v. Kelley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A court should not be required or permitted to browse amongst its own records .. ..where the object of the inquiry is to arrive at its own particular judgment in whole or in part on an extraneous record not introduced[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hunt v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-15· cited 32×
• Vandiver v. Vincent
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-03-28· cited 32×
• Maistrosky v. Harvey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-09-22· cited 12×
• Moskovits v. Moskovits
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-06-09· cited 11×
• National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Underwood
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-25· cited 4×
• JOHNELL DAYTHWON LANG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-25· cited 4×
• Freeman v. Adkinson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-24· cited 3×
• State v. Romanez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-09· cited 3×
• In re Estate of Simpkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-03-02· cited 2×
• Sherman v. Herman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-03-20· cited 1×
• Sheldon v. Tiernan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-11-14
• Fonell v. Featherstone
  Monroe County Circuit Court· 1957-07-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lightsey v. Lightsey
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1942-05-26· cited 17×
• Bouguille v. Dede
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1854-05-15· cited 6×
• Thames v. Thames
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-10-19· cited 1×