Kelley v. Corrections Corporation of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing 15 a Rule 12(f) motion challenging the sufficiency of allegations supporting punitive damages as a 16 Rule 12(b)(6) motion
• rejecting conclusory allegations 13 of malice because they did not meet the pleading standards of Twombly and Iqbal
• “Since Plaintiff’s 22 claims for failure to accommodate and failure to engage in the interactive process have survived 23 Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the court finds that dismissal of Plaintiff’s wrongful termination 24 claim is not warranted.”
• converting improperly 1 designated motion to strike to 12(b)(6) motion
• setting forth different standards for the two motions
• opposition 21 to policy or practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).