Kelley v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an applicant does not have the opportunity “for a retrial of the medical facts” where the medical panel has applied proper procedures and correct principles of law
• local retirement board may not ignore regional medical panel’s findings, unless clear that panel used erroneous standard, failed, to follow proper procedure, or its decision is “plainly wrong”
• where medical panel makes negative finding on issue of causation, applicant is not entitled to retrial of the medical facts absent showing that panel applied improper procedures or legal standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).