Skip to main content
· 3/11/1997

Kelley v. American Heyer-Schulte Corp.

Citations

  • 957 F. Supp. 873
  • 46 Fed. R. Serv. 1359
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5623
  • 1997 WL 120293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that observed association between exposure and condition may reflect true cause-effect relationship or spurious finding, and to distinguish between these alternatives, it is necessary first to consider confounding factors
  • excluding expert testimony by plaintiff’s epidemiologist and rheumatologist regarding a causal link between plaintiff’s implants and her symptoms of Sjogren’s Syndrome
  • “[i]n the absence of any evidence regarding general causation, the Court will not permit Dr. Espinoza to testify as to specific causation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.