· 2/24/1986
Keller v. Salton
Citations
- 475 U.S. 1027
- 106 S. Ct. 1227
- 89 L. Ed. 2d 336
- 54 U.S.L.W. 3563
- 1986 U.S. LEXIS 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Unless the regulation limits an official’s discretion in denying the benefit to “objective and defined” criteria, no protected interest has been created.
- restrictions on library use, and requirement of body cavity search before and after library use, justified by security and administrative concerns
- inmate has property interest in funds in his prison account
- inmate has property interest in funds in his prison account
- upholding visual body cavity searches following visits to law library
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.