Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 7/24/1995
Keller v. O'Brien
Citations
- 420 Mass. 820
- 47 A.L.R. 5th 855
- 652 N.E.2d 589
- 1995 Mass. LEXIS 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- award of alimony is improper absent finding of financial need on part of recipient spouse
- \This court has affirmed the termination of alimony payments on the recipient spouse's remarriage where the parties included automatic termination provisions in an agreement found to survive the divorce judgment\
- “The mere fact that, without alimony, the defendant would not be able to live with her second husband in the way in which she lived prior to her marriage to him is not a valid reason to continue alimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liacos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pierce v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-11-09· cited 86×
- Heins v. LedisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-04-18· cited 64×
- Keller v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-08-21· cited 46×
- Bernier v. BernierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-09-14· cited 25×
- Champion v. ChampionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-03-19· cited 22×
- Ruml v. RumlMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-11-21· cited 20×
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-01-07· cited 19×
- Cox v. CoxMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-12-31· cited 17×
- Heron v. HeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-12-21· cited 11×
- Wooters v. WootersMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-04-03· cited 9×
- Broome v. BroomeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-09-22· cited 5×
- Becker v. PhelpsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-08-22· cited 2×
- Mathis v. MathisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-03-17
- Wolff v. WolffMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-08-08
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court· 1977-11-08· cited 223×
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court· 1977-12-28· cited 150×
- Schuler v. SchulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-27· cited 90×
- In Re the Marriage of LaloneSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-05-15· cited 67×
- Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-06-15· cited 62×
- Gottsegen v. GottsegenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-05-22· cited 58×
- Surabian v. SurabianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-07-18· cited 58×
- French v. McAnarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-05-01· cited 49×
- Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-12-11· cited 45×
- In Re the Marriage of ShimaSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-01-16· cited 45×
- Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-01-16· cited 42×
- Robbins v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-11-29· cited 38×
- Steffens v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-07-07· cited 37×
- Herzmark v. HerzmarkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-05-13· cited 35×
- Bush v. BushMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-05-16· cited 30×
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-09-03· cited 27×
- Voyles v. VoylesAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-05-14· cited 25×
- Marquardt v. Marquardt by RempferSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 24×
- Dunaway v. DunawayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.