Keller v. Larkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a failure-to-warn plaintiff must show “through experts or otherwise why the warnings are allegedly inadequate or how the existing warnings could be improved” (quoting Hoffman v. Paper Converting Machine Co., 694 F. Supp. 2d 359, 367 (E.D. Pa. 2010)
• “full cross-examination on the subject would only have revealed that the diagnosis was of a proposed psychiatric category, not that it was an inadmissible or improper consideration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).