Keller v. First National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even though offer to insure was extended by mistake it created an expectation of coverage therefore coverage could not be denied
• finding that an offer to insure extended by mistake created an expectation of coverage and, therefore, the insurer couldn’t deny coverage
• stating that \[a]n action based on a reasonable expectation of insurance usually will raise substantial questions of fact.\
• stating that “[a]n action based on a reasonable expectation of insurance usually will raise substantial questions of fact.”
• finding that even though offer to insure was extended by mistake it created an expectation of coverage therefore coverage could not be denied
• explaining that, after a bank’s offer to insure was accepted with consideration, the bank had created an expectation of credit life insurance in the insured even though the bank’s offer had been extended by mistake, and the bank could not deny coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).