Keller Industries, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that revisory motion filed within 10 days of entry of final judgment in orphans’ court did not toll the running of the 30-day period, under Rule 8-202(a), in which to note an appeal from that judgment to Court of Special Appeals
• finding that an appeal, filed more than thirty days after judgment but fewer than thirty days after denial of motion for reconsideration, would lie and that the scope of review would be “limited to whether the trial judge abused his discretion in declining to reconsider the judgment”
• finding that an appeal, filed more than thirty days after judgment but fewer than thirty days after denial of motion for reconsideration, would lie and that the scope of review would be “limited to whether the trial judge abused his discretion in declining to reconsider the judgment”
• an orphans’ court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration of a judgment was an immediately appealable final judgment because it “has the effect of putting the parties out of court”
• an orphans' court's denial of a motion for reconsideration of a judgment was an immediately appealable final judgment because it \has the effect of putting the parties out of court\
• “Even if an action is commenced beyond this six-month limitations period, however, a personal representative may be estopped to assert the statute of limitations as a defense if the delay in commencing an action was induced by the personal representative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).