Keller Industries, Inc. v. Morgart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error regarding inconsistent interrogatory verdicts could not be corrected because counsel failed to bring inconsistency to court’s attention before jury discharged
• holding that error regarding inconsistent interrogatory verdicts could not be corrected because counsel failed to bring inconsistency to court's attention before jury discharged
• in-dicating reversal was not required in a case where the jury entered an inconsistent verdict because trial counsel failed to address the error before the jury was discharged, thus preventing the trial court from timely correcting problem
• “For all we know, defendant’s trial counsel intentionally, for tactical reasons, chose not to bring the problem to the court’s attention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).