Skip to main content

Kellems v. State

Citations

  • 842 N.E.2d 352
  • 2006 Ind. LEXIS 130
  • 2006 WL 349807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a \tip from an identified informant or concerned citizen coupled with some corroborative police investigation is sufficient to create reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop\ (emphasis added)
  • holding that the exigent circumstances described by a concerned citizen were “particularly relevant” to justifying the need for a Terry stop
  • holding that the exigent circumstances described by a con cerned citizen were “particularly relevant” to justifying the need for a Terry stop
  • holding that \a tip from an identified informant or concerned citizen coupled with some corroborative police investigation is sufficient to create reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop\
  • holding that a caller who had reported an intoxicated driver was not an anonymous caller but a concerned citizen because she had provided her name, even though her identity could not later be verified
  • holding that a caller who had reported an intoxicated driver was not an anonymous caller but a concerned citizen because she had provided her name, even though her identity could not later be verified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.