Skip to main content
· 1/11/1974

Kellam v. Thomas

Citations

  • 287 So. 2d 733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the corroborating consistent statement must be shown to have been made prior to the existence of a fact said to indicate bias, interest, corruption, or other motive to falsify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.