Skip to main content
· 12/13/1976

Kelce v. Touche Ross & Co.

Citations

  • 557 P.2d 374
  • 192 Colo. 202
  • 1976 Colo. LEXIS 712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, given Colorado’s constitutional access to courts provisions, the expense of securing witnesses, the location of the evidence, and the availability of another court were not a basis for dismissal under this doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pringle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.