Kelaidis v. Community First National Bank (In Re Kelaidis)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Cottam court “might have meant only that it had left open the question of the consequence of notice errors” as opposed to commercial reasonability errors
• “[W]e are not certain that the dicta in Cottam meant that the Utah Supreme Court had left open the possibility that a creditor could obtain a deficiency judgment after making a commercially unreasonable disposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).