Kel-Mar Designs, Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insurer had duty to defend additional insured with respect to injury suffered by subcontractor’s employee while performing operations for additional insured
• finding no additional insured coverage or duty to defend certain entities because named insured “did not perform operations for them pursuant to a written contract” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).