Keith v. Volpe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a finding of contempt or obstruction of implementation is not a prerequisite to an award of attorney fees for reasonable post-judgment monitoring of a consent decree\
• holding that “a finding of contempt or obstruction of implementation is not a prerequisite to an award of attorney fees for reasonable post-judgment monitoring of a consent decree”
• “Are Contempt Findings a Prerequisite to Section 1988 Awards for Monitoring?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Walker v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
  Fifth Circuit· 1996-11-19· cited 291×
• Prison Legal News v. Schwarzenegger
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 186×
• Glover v. Johnson
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-05-30· cited 95×
• Gates v. Gomez
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-09· cited 65×
• Jerry E. Stewart Richard Eugene Smith Kenneth Wilson William Brown v. Brad Gates, Sheriff William Wallace Ralph A. Diedrich Robert W. Battin
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-03-12· cited 61×
• Jeff D. v. Andrus
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-03-20· cited 48×
• Alliance to End Repression, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Chicago, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-02-27· cited 40×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-07-01· cited 38×
• Joseph A. ex rel. Wolfe v. New Mexico Department of Human Services
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 24×
• Balla v. Idaho
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-17· cited 23×
• Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information Agency
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-03-12· cited 17×
• Former Employees of Tyco Electronics, Fiber Optics Div. v. US Dept. of Labor
  Court of International Trade· 2004-09-16· cited 10×
• Robinson v. Ariyoshi
  D. Hawaii· 1989-01-18· cited 9×
• United States v. City and County of San Francisco
  N.D. California· 1988-08-31· cited 5×
• Coppedge v. Franklin County Board of Education
  E.D. North Carolina· 2004-10-05· cited 4×
• Wolfe v. New Mexico Department Of Human Services
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 3×
• Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. Napolitano
  E.D. California· 2011-11-15· cited 3×
• State of Idaho v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-29· cited 2×
• Lozeau v. Lake County, Mont.
  D. Montana· 2000-04-04· cited 2×
• San Francisco National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. San Francisco Unified School District
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-04-01· cited 2×