Keith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of a checklist alone, without specific findings of fact, does not fulfill the statutory requirements of section 39.111(7)(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lang v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-13· cited 20×
• Tighe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-13· cited 9×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-18· cited 5×
• Leach v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-06· cited 3×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 2×
• Hicks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-08
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-29
• Edwards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rhoden
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-04-05· cited 176×
• Posey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-29· cited 19×
• Grandison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-30· cited 4×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-11· cited 1×