Keith v. Lothrop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “ ‘conditions’ as used in ORS 656.245(1)(a) refers to the claimant’s current conditions for which treatment is sought” (emphasis in original)
• assuming that “Brown does interpret ORS 656.005(7)(a) to hold that ‘compensable injury’ means only accepted conditions”
• holding, with regard to the first sentence, “the ‘injury’ is the work accident that caused the medical condition and resulted in the need for medical services” (emphasis added)
• “There is substantial evidence in the record, * * *, that the injections are ‘for’ claimant’s low back pain.”
• “[T]he assumption of consistency is only an assumption. The text and context of a statute can refute that assumption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).