Keith v. Bobby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• differentiating between habeas petitions premised on impeachment evidence, and petitions based on “new evidence that . . . directly contradicted the government’s case in chief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Munchinski v. Harry Wilson
  Third Circuit· 2012-09-11· cited 147×
• Keith v. Bobby
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-08-31· cited 44×
• In re Campbell
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-10-26· cited 32×
• George Clark v. Noah Nagy
  Sixth Circuit· 2019-08-12· cited 22×
• Kevin Keith v. Leon Hill
  Sixth Circuit· 2023-08-15· cited 3×
• State v. Keith
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-26· cited 1×
• Curt Russell Cannamela
  Sixth Circuit· 2023-06-12· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Schlup v. Delo
  Supreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• United States v. Agurs
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
• Napue v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
• Sawyer v. Whitley
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,925×
• Parrish Towns, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. David Smith, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-01-07· cited 225×
• Kevin Keith v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-07-10· cited 207×
• Donald Bennett v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-03-03· cited 173×
• Vasquez v. Jones
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-07-24· cited 127×
• In Re Gregory Lott, Movant
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-04-22· cited 55×
• In Re: Thomas Clyde Bowling, Jr., Movant (04-6194). Thomas Clyde Bowling, Jr., (04-6378) v. Glenn Haeberline, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-09-07· cited 50×
• In Re: Billy Williams, Movant
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-05-27· cited 44×
• In Re McDonald
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-01-10· cited 42×