Seventh Circuit· 4/28/2014

Keith Lee v. Brian Foster

Citations

750 F.3d 687
2014 WL 1663116
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the Allen rule is a well-rooted procedural requirement in Wisconsin and is therefore adequate”
holding that the Allen rule “clearly served as an independent basis for the court’s denial of [petitioner’s] motion”
holding that State v. Allen, 682 N.W.2d 433 (Wis. 2004) is an independent and adequate state ground
noting that “a defendant’s mere presence at the defense table is not enough to establish a violation of due process”
noting that “[t]he Allen rule is a well-rooted procedural requirement in Wisconsin and is therefore adequate.” (citations omitted)
holding that a claim is procedurally defaulted “if the last state court that rendered judgment ‘clearly and expressly states that its judgment rests on a state procedural bar’” (quoting Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 263, 109 S. Ct. 1038, 1043 (1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Kanne, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.