Sixth Circuit· 8/18/2005

Keith Harbin-Bey v. Lyle Rutter

Citations

420 F.3d 571
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17511
2005 WL 1981877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a prisoner does not have a constitutional right to be placed in a specific security classification
holding that “an increase in security classification . . . does not constitute an atypical and significant hardship”
holding that a prisoner does not have a constitutional right to be placed in a specific security classification
stating that “a prisoner has no constitutional right to remain incarcerated in a particular prison or to beheld in a specific security classification”
finding that “a prisoner does not have a constitutional right to be placed in a specific security classification”
stating that “conclusory allegations of retaliatory motive unsupported by material facts will not be sufficient to state a . . . claim” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Clay, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.