Skip to main content
· 11/24/2015

Keith Curtis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Citations

  • 807 F.3d 215
  • 25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1397
  • 32 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 519
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20446
  • 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,446
  • 2015 WL 7455281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a district court has discretion to strictly enforce local rules, including by deeming a party’s facts admitted
  • explaining that the Seventh Circuit has “routinely upheld the district court’s discretion in requiring parties to comply strictly with local rule requirements.”
  • explaining that a district court has discretion to strictly enforce local rules, including by deeming a party’s facts admitted
  • explaining that summary judgment is proper when the undisputed evidence is that the adverse employment action was based on poor job performance or misconduct
  • finding that district court did not abuse its discretion in deeming facts admitted where plaintiff “provided only boilerplate objections, such as ‘relevance’ and ‘vague and ambiguous.’”
  • finding that district court did not abuse its discretion in deeming facts admitted where the plaintiff “provided only boilerplate objections, such as ‘relevance’ and ‘vague and ambiguous.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Bauer, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.