Keim v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a defendant who pleaded no contest to rape could not thereafter challenge the sufficiency of the government’s evidence that the victim did not consent to the act of sexual intercourse
• the statute \sufficiently warns a person of common intelligence that engaging in sexual intercourse with one who is mentally handicapped to a degree that he or she cannot understand the nature and consequences of engaging in the act is prohibited\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).