Keilich v. Blum

Citations

• 214 Pa. 54
• 63 A. 453
• 1906 Pa. LEXIS 597

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Oral contract — Written contract — Commissions on sale of property — Partnership.</p> <p>On a bill in equity for an accounting, it appeared that plaintiffs and defendant had entered into an oral agreement to divide profits realized from any sale of a certain property, and that subsequently they entered into a written agreement as to division of profits on one particular sale that was contemplated. The court below, affirmed by the Supreme Court, held from a construction of the oral and written agreements, and from the acts of the parties, that the written agreement superseded the oral agreement so that the plaintiffs were not entitled to share in the profits realized by defendant, on a sale other than that specified in the written agreement.</p>