Skip to main content
· 8/28/2003

Keife v. Logan

Citations

  • 75 P.3d 357
  • 119 Nev. 372
  • 119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 41
  • 2003 Nev. LEXIS 46
  • 2003 WL 22021936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that this court \will not disturb a district court's findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence\
  • concluding that this court “will not disturb a district court’s findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence”
  • holding that the bylaws were void to the extent that they conflicted with the corporation act and the articles of incorporation
  • noting that a judgment is void if its entry failed to comply with due process
  • stating that \this court will not disturb a district court's findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence\
  • \[T]his court will not disturb a district court's findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Maupin, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.