· 8/28/2003
Keife v. Logan
Citations
- 75 P.3d 357
- 119 Nev. 372
- 119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 41
- 2003 Nev. LEXIS 46
- 2003 WL 22021936
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that this court \will not disturb a district court's findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence\
- concluding that this court “will not disturb a district court’s findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence”
- holding that the bylaws were void to the extent that they conflicted with the corporation act and the articles of incorporation
- noting that a judgment is void if its entry failed to comply with due process
- stating that \this court will not disturb a district court's findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence\
- \[T]his court will not disturb a district court's findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Maupin, Gibbons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.