Kehr v. Kehr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for the proposition that “the purpose of abatement,] ‘to avoid multiplicity of suits,’ does not apply where the matters are consolidated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pendleton v. Pendleton
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-05· cited 71×
• County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. Partnership
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-12-24· cited 49×
• Breiner v. Olson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-12-31· cited 20×
• Miller v. Arends
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1974-03-14· cited 8×
• National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Shull
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-03-11· cited 7×
• Western Plastics Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1969-06-13· cited 3×
• Mercer v. Mercer
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1968-11-01· cited 1×
• NAT. BANK OF COMMERCE TRUST & SAV. v. Shull
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-03-11

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Skiles
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1962-01-26· cited 31×
• State ex rel. C., B. & Q. R. v. North Lincoln Street Railway Co.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1892-05-18· cited 10×
• Scholz v. Scholz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1961-05-05· cited 9×

Other cases named Kehr v. Kehr

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Kehr v. Kehr
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 1933-04-24· cited 1×