· 12/15/2008
Kehoe v. WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN AND DIXON
Citations
- 899 N.E.2d 1177
- 387 Ill. App. 3d 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiff was entitled to prejudgment interest on judgement entered for breach of contract claim
- holding such fees to be litigation expenses, not recoverable \court costs\
- First District decision allowing interest under the Interest Act, reversing court’s denial because the claim was not filed before judgment was entered
- motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are reviewed de novo
- breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garcia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.