Skip to main content
· 12/15/2008

Kehoe v. WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN AND DIXON

Citations

  • 899 N.E.2d 1177
  • 387 Ill. App. 3d 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff was entitled to prejudgment interest on judgement entered for breach of contract claim
  • holding such fees to be litigation expenses, not recoverable \court costs\
  • First District decision allowing interest under the Interest Act, reversing court’s denial because the claim was not filed before judgment was entered
  • motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are reviewed de novo
  • breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garcia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.