Keglar v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although officers need not explore every claim of innocence, their deliberate disregard of known facts may defeat probable cause
• noting that the “dispositive inquiry ... is whether it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was unlawful in the situation he confronted”
• stating that Jones, upon which Plaintiffs rely here, held that officers could 15 not indiscriminately arrest peaceful protestors without an order to disperse
• concluding “that the defendants . . . had, from their personal observations, sufficient evidence to establish probable cause”
• noting that the “dispositive inquiry ... is whether it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was unlawful in the situation he confronted”
• noting party's concession that video was incorporated, but declining to decide whether Rule 10(c) incoiporation extends to videos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).