Skip to main content
· 6/25/1992

Keetch v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

Citations

  • 831 P.2d 784
  • 66 Wash. App. 208
  • 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an insured could not recover under business interruption insurance when volcanic ash caused damage to motel and quality of service was reduced, but motel never ceased operations
  • denying coverage for \interruption of business\ for decline in occupancy at motel because falling ash from volcano explosion did not decrease the availability of rooms
  • denying coverage for “interruption of business” for decline in occupancy at motel because falling ash from volcano explosion did not decrease the availability of rooms
  • damage from volcanic eruption causing a reduction in business at motel not a suspension of business activity
  • \[t]he endorsement does not provide that coverage exists because the motel's quality of service may be diminished by an occurrence\
  • “[t]he endorsement does not provide that coverage exists because the motel’s quality of service may be diminished by an occurrence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.