· 6/25/1992
Keetch v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance
Citations
- 831 P.2d 784
- 66 Wash. App. 208
- 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an insured could not recover under business interruption insurance when volcanic ash caused damage to motel and quality of service was reduced, but motel never ceased operations
- denying coverage for \interruption of business\ for decline in occupancy at motel because falling ash from volcano explosion did not decrease the availability of rooms
- denying coverage for “interruption of business” for decline in occupancy at motel because falling ash from volcano explosion did not decrease the availability of rooms
- damage from volcanic eruption causing a reduction in business at motel not a suspension of business activity
- \[t]he endorsement does not provide that coverage exists because the motel's quality of service may be diminished by an occurrence\
- “[t]he endorsement does not provide that coverage exists because the motel’s quality of service may be diminished by an occurrence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.