Keesling v. T.E.K. Partners, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a second note, which in part capitalized interest due on the original note, constituted a material alteration of the original obligation and that, as such, the guarantor or surety was discharged
• holding that issuance of a second note that included additional funds, capitalized interest due on the first note, and extended the time for payment constituted a material alteration thereby discharging the guarantors from liability under the mortgage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).