Kees v. Wallenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that jail’s placement of corrections officers on light-duty status for indefinite periods of time did not alter written policy of providing only temporary light-duty assignments
• relying on jail’s standard operating procedures manual and concluding that corrections officers’ light-duty assignments were not permanent
• the 8 “essential function” question is an issue of fact, not law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).