Keenon v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ranch’s use of public website providing information on how to register as a guest and learn more about the property was no more than “selectively attempting to increase membership” and did not constitute advertising to general public
• declining to retain supplemental jurisdiction over 3 plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim after granting summary judgment to 4 defendant on plaintiff’s ADA claim
• “A gymnasium or golf course may be open only to authorized members and their guests, but that does not necessarily preclude it from being classified as a place of public accommodation.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).