Keener v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party possessing same constructive knowledge as state could not have been disadvantaged by state's incorrect representation
• rejecting landowners’ laches argument because the state need not do anything to confirm ownership of a right-of-way created in a federal patent unless and until its rights are challenged
• “The State does not have to pay a property owner for a preexisting right of way [under the Alaska Constitution].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Las Vegas v. Cliff Shadows Professional Plaza, LLC
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 26×
• Kollander v. Kollander
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-04-18· cited 16×
• Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 15×
• T.P.D. v. A.C.D.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-05-28· cited 10×
• Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2002-06-14· cited 5×
• Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2018-10-05· cited 5×
• Anderson v. Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2019-04-19· cited 5×
• Safeway, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-11-02· cited 2×
• Tpd v. Acd
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-05-28
• Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Douglas Baker and Silverbow Mining LLC
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-08-08