Keener v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that an RFC assessment is based on all the relevant evidence, including the medical evidence and the claimant’s subjective description of his or her limitations
• citing, inter alia, Nelson v. Sullivan, 946 F.2d 1314, 1315 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam
• vacating and remanding for new medical improvement evaluation where cited evidence did not show a difference between claimant’s current condition and condition existing at the time of disability
• finding the ALJ’s determination that the plaintiff’s subjective complaints were inconsistent with the record was in error because the determination was not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole
• “By relying on Dr. Rammos's note—which did not opine on Koch's pain or ability to work—instead of the doctors who did opine on Koch's pain and ability to work, the ALJ improperly drew his own inferences about Koch's RFC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).