Keenan v. Wade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s calculations for owelty but not addressing the inclusion of prejudgment interest
• affirming superior court's reliance on lay owner's opinion of value that the superior court found \seems well[-]based on recent like property transactions\ even though owner \is not an appraiser and has contempt for them\
• rejecting argument that landowner's opinions of value were inadmissible as failing to meet the lay witness requirements of Evidence Rule 701\because we have held that a property owner's testimony regarding the value of his own land is admissible\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).