Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/10/1997
Keenan v. Maass
Citations
- 149 Or. App. 576
- 945 P.2d 526
- 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a con- dition that causes constant or recurring pain amounts to a serious medical need
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, Haselton, Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 39×
- Billings v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-22· cited 15×
- Priest v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-02-17· cited 11×
- Keenan v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-24· cited 4×
- Keenan v. MaassOregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.