Skip to main content
· 6/21/1993

Keels v. Pierce

Citations

  • 433 S.E.2d 902
  • 315 S.C. 339
  • 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court may order consolidation, absent an abuse of discretion, whenever there are actions pending before the court that involve a common question of law or fact
  • “In the absence of an express agreement or consent, a waiver of the right to a jury trial will not be presumed.”
  • \An appellate court will not disturb a [circuit] court's ruling on a motion to consolidate absent an abuse of discretion.\
  • \An appellate court will not disturb a [circuit] court's ruling on a motion to consolidate absent an abuse of discretion.\
  • \The moving party has the burden of persuading the court that consolidation is desirable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.