Keeler v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a full interest analysis may point to the law where the fraudulent act occurred
• instructing federal district courts to defer to state intermediate appellate courts unless there are “persuasive data” that the state’s highest court would disagree
• “Assuming there is an actual conflict between New York and Israeli law, we applied New York’s interest-analysis test to determine which law should apply.”
• rejecting First Department case which was “not a statement of an unsettled or ambiguous rule, but rather an application of a previously established rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).