Keeler v. City of Hampton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in order to state a claim for a breach of an express warranty in New York, a plaintiff must plead “that an express warranty existed, was breached, and that [the plaintiff] had relied on that warranty”
• dismissing design defect claim where complaint \plead the legal conclusion\ that the risks of using a prescription drug outweighed the benefits instead of \facts identifying\ the drug's design defect
• applying New York law, plaintiff must “plead facts identifying [drug’s] design defect,” not “merely plead[] the legal conclusion that the [drug] was defective”
• applying New York law, plaintiff must “plead facts identifying [drug’s] design defect,” not “merely plead[] the legal conclusion that the [drug] was defective”
• applying New York law, plaintiff must “plead facts identifying [drug’s] design defect,” not “merely plead[] the legal conclusion that the [drug] was defective”
• applying New York law, plaintiff must “plead facts identifying [drug’s] design defect,” not “merely plead[] the legal conclusion that the [drug] was defective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).