Keel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in enacting AS 22.20.020(a)(5), the legislature did not intend “to disqualify a judge because of his prior employment by the state government from all cases in which the State appears as a party during the prohibited period of time”
• former assistant district attorney not disqualified from acting as judge in a criminal action
• former assistant district attorney not disqualified from acting as judge in a criminal action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amidon v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-21· cited 61×
• Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-09-26· cited 49×
• Wasserman v. Bartholomew
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-09-20· cited 22×
• Mustafoski v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-01-28· cited 18×
• In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Walton
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1984-01-03· cited 17×
• DeNardo v. Michalski
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-05-24· cited 14×
• Michael Joseph Johnson v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2020-10-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Haas
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-07-01· cited 17×
• People v. Thomas
  California Supreme Court· 1972-12-20· cited 8×
• People v. Haas
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-05-05· cited 2×