Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/22/2021

Keel v. Saul

Citations

  • 986 F.3d 551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if the ALJ “failed to properly apply the Stone standard [for severe impairment], such a conclusion does not require an automatic reversal”
  • holding that ALJ’s failure to apply the correct standard for severe impairment does not automatically warrant reversal
  • holding that “[t]hough the precise wording differs, Stone and SSR 85-28 are not substantially different enough to warrant a finding of error.”
  • stating that the claimant bears the burden on the first four steps
  • holding SSR 85-28 is consistent with Stone v. Heckler
  • “Harmless error exists when it is inconceivable that a different administrative conclusion would have been reached even if the ALJ did not err.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.