Keel v. Beard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an evidentiary hearing was not required due to the lack of factual disputes concerning the defendant’s guilty plea
• “We have never held that [Rule 11] embraces circumstances known to a defendant at the time of the guilty plea . . . .”
• “We have never held that [Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d)(2)(B) ] also embraces circumstances known to a defendant at the time of the guilty plea, and we decline to do so now.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).