Keebler Company v. Murray Bakery Products

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If all one had to do to obtain a grant of a Rule 16 56[(d
• “If all one had to do to obtain a grant of a Rule 9 56[(d
• “If all one had to do to obtain a grant of a Rule 56([d]) motion were to allege possession by movant of ‘certain information’ and ‘other evidence’, every summary judgment decision would have to be delayed while the non-movant goes fishing in the movant’s files.”
• “If all one had to do to obtain a grant of a Rule 56( [d] ) motion were to allege possession by movant of ‘certain information’ and ‘other evidence,’ every summary judgment decision would have to be delayed while the non-movant goes fishing in the movant’s files.”
• CHIROPRACTIC and CHIRO-MATIC not confusingly similar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).