Keck's Administrator v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that certification under Rule 23(b)(1)(A) was appropriate because “because the defendants have a statutory obligation, as well as a fiduciary responsibility, to treat the members of the class alike” (internal quotations omitted)
• “The Supreme Court has observed that actions for breach of fiduciary duties are ‘classic examples’ of Rule 23(b)(1
• “Even when unopposed, a motion for class certification must be evaluated on its merits.”
• “[T]he structure of ERISA favors the principles enumerated under Rule 23(b)(1)(B), since the statute creates a ‘shared’ set of rights among the plan participants by imposing duties on the fiduciaries relative to the plan . . . .”
• “[T]he structure of ERISA favors the principles enumerated under Rule 23(b)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).